Sound familiar?
What's actually going wrong
The specific symptoms we see most often.
It breaks every time you prompt it
A fix for one screen quietly changes another. Regressions stack up because nothing is tested, so every prompt is a gamble on what else moves.
Supabase RLS lockouts
Row Level Security policies generated early get more contradictory as the schema grows, until legitimate users get permission-denied errors on data that should be theirs.
Broken Google / Apple OAuth
Sign-in works in the Lovable preview and fails on your real domain — usually a redirect URI or provider config that was never set for production.
Stripe webhooks not firing
A customer pays, and your database never hears about it. The webhook endpoint, secret, or event subscription is misconfigured, silently, until someone complains.
White screens
A blank page with no error in the UI, only in the console — usually an unhandled exception in a component with no error boundary around it.
Broken routing and env mismatches after deploy
Routes that resolve in the Lovable preview 404 on your own domain, or the app calls the wrong Supabase project because preview and production environment variables were never actually separated.
Why this happens
Lovable (and tools like it) optimize for one thing: getting you to a working screen as fast as possible. That's genuinely useful for validating an idea. But the code generated to get there rarely has error boundaries, rarely separates preview and production config cleanly, and rarely writes RLS policies with the whole schema in mind — because at generation time, there usually isn't a whole schema yet.
None of that is a reason to throw the app away. Most of what's broken is fixable without touching the parts that already work — which is exactly what an audit is for.
What we do about it
Read the actual codebase and Supabase project
Not just the UI — we open your RLS policies, auth config, and webhook setup directly, since that's where most Lovable bugs actually live.
Reproduce the bug, then fix the cause
We confirm the failure ourselves before touching code, so the fix addresses the actual bug instead of the symptom you happened to notice.
Separate preview from production properly
Distinct environment variables and Supabase projects (or clearly scoped policies) so a preview change can't silently break what's live.
Add the guardrails that were missing
Error boundaries, webhook logging, and basic tests around the flows that broke — so the same bug class doesn't come back next month.
Hand back a codebase you own
Documented, in your own repo and Supabase project — not locked behind a builder you're renting.
Related case studies
Recent work from the same team.
What clients say
Direct quotes from founders we've worked with — added as they come in.
“He significantly improved the performance and smoothness of my app, and the quality of his work is outstanding. He is reliable, professional, and always willing to find the best solution.”
mariusz100
Long-term Fiverr client · Poland
“Abdullah did an exceptional job updating and improving my project. They understood exactly what I needed, paid great attention to detail, and delivered high-quality work beyond my expectations.”
howeasyymp
Fiverr client · Cyprus
“Each stage is completed reliably, quickly, and with full professionalism. You can trust him with any task — it will be done well. Communication is smooth, clear, and never a problem.”
mariusz100
Repeat Fiverr client · Poland
Frequently asked questions
What founders usually ask before reaching out.
Need Help With This?
Share your current product stage and we’ll suggest the best next step.